Self-efficacy, motivation and academic performance of students during the flexible learning mode
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14295/bjs.v2i9.357Keywords:
self-efficacy, motivation, academic performance, flexible learning mode, pandemicAbstract
Self-Efficacy is the belief that a person is capable of achieving a specific goal or performing a particular task while motivation represents the foundation for success in all activities that an individual engages in. This study aimed to determine the correlations between self-efficacy, motivation and academic performance of 862 students. Using spearman’s rho, results revealed that self-efficacy and motivation go along together for all students with different specializations. Most of the students’ grades are not directly affected by the motivation and self-efficacy. Responses of students for most of the challenges they encountered during the flexible learning mode are limited home setup for activities that require actual performances followed by the distraction they get from social media. Results of this study reveals that even during the pandemic, the students have positive outlook in life, but grades are not dependent on their self-efficacy and motivations.
References
Artino, A. R. (2012). Academic self-efficacy: From educational theory to instructional practice. Perspect Medical Education, 1(2), 76-85. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3540350/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/S40037-012-0012-5
Becirovic, S., & Becirovic, R. H. (2017). The role of age in students’ motivation and achievement in learning English as a second language. DOI: 10.29302/jolie.2017.10.1.2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29302/jolie.2017.10.1.2
Blackburn, B. (2020). 6 Issues Students Face in Remote Learning. Retrieved from: https://www.middleweb.com/43696/6-issues-students-may-face-in-remote-learning/
Doménech-Betoret F., Gómez-Artiga A., & Lloret-Segura S. (2014). Personal variables, motivation and avoidance learning strategies in undergraduate students. Learn. Individ. Differ. 35, 122-129. 10.1016/j.lindif.2014.06.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2014.06.007
Gillett-Swan J. (2017). The challenges of online learning supporting and engaging isolated learner. Journal of Learning Design, 10(1), 20-30. https://doi.org/10.5204/jld.v9i3.293 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5204/jld.v9i3.293
Graham, C. R., & Misanchuk, M. (2004). Computer-mediated learning groups: Benefits and challenges to using groupwork in online learning environments. In: T. S. Roberts (Ed.), Online Collaborative Learning: Theory and Practice (pp. 181-202). Hershey, PA: Idea Group. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59140-174-2.ch008
Ferlazzo, L. (2020). Four ways to help students feel intrinsically motivated to do distance learning. Retrieved from: https://www.edweek.org/teaching-learning/opinion-four-ways-to-help-students-feel-intrinsically-motivated-to-do-distance-learning/2020/04
Helms, S. (n.d.). Educational technology research topics. Retrieved from: https://classroom.synonym.com/educational-technology-research-proposal-topics-4430.html#self-efficacy, -motivation, -and-performance
Jaques, D., & Salmon, G. (2007). Learning in groups: A handbook for face-to-face and online environments. Abingdon, UK: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203016459
Jerusalem, M., & Schwarzer, R. (1992). Self-efficacy: Thought control of action. Washington DC: Hemisphere.
Kusurkar, R. A., Ten Cate, Th. J., Vos, C. M. P., Westers, P. & Croiset, G. (2012). How motivation affects academic performance: a structural equation modelling analysis. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 18, 57-69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-012-9354-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-012-9354-3
Lewis, J. L., Ream, Robert K., Bocian, K. M., & Cardullo, R. A. (2012). Con Carino: teacher caring, math self-efficacy, and math achievement among hispanic English learners. Teachers College Record, 114 (7), 151-163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811211400701
Maddux, J. E. (2005). The power of believing you can. In: C.R. Synder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.). Handbook of Positive Psychology (pp. 277-287). New York: Oxford University press.
Maropamabi, G. (2014). Role of self-efficacy and self-esteem in academic performance. European Journal of Educational Sciences, 2(2), 8-22.
Nasihah, M., & Cahyono, B. Y. (2017). Language learning strategies, motivation, and writing achievement of Indonesian EFL students. Arab World English Journal, 8(1), 250-263. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2945905 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol8no1.18
Pub Med: When Self-efficacy Negatively Relates to Motivation and Performance in a Learning Context.
Reyes, E., Enfedaque, A., & Galvez, J. C. (2017). Initiatives to foster engineering student motivation: A case study. Journal of Technology and Science Education (JOTSE), 7(3), 291-312. http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=331152600003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.265
Saif, A. (2014). The relationship between self-efficacy, motivation, and academic achievement of undergraduate students in Yemen. Assut University Journal of Education Psychology, 30, 14-20.
Salmon, G. (2014). Learning innovation: A framework for transformation. European Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 17(1), 219-235. https://doi.org/10.2478/eurodl-2014-0031 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/eurodl-2014-0031
Schunk, D. H., & Dibenedetto, M. K. (2020). Self-efficacy and human motivation. the university of north Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, NC, United States ∗ November 2020. Corresponding author: e-mail address: dhschunk@uncg.edu
Self-efficacy and Resource Allocation: Support for a Nonmonotonic, Discontinuous Model; J. B. Vancouver, K. M. More & R. J. Yoder.
Synthesizing experiences: Lessons to be learned from internet-mediated simulation games; T. Asakawa & N. Gilbert. The Advantages of Classroom Observation (synonym.com).
Tough, P. (2014). Who gets to graduate? New York Times Magazine. Retrieved from: http://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/18/magazine/who-gets-to-graduate.html?_r=1
Tuan, H., Chin, C. & Shieh, S. (2005). The development of a questionnaire to measure students’ motivation towards science learning. International Journal of Science Education, 27(6), 639-654. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069042000323737
Weda, S., & Sakti, A. E. F. (2018). The relationship between study anxiety and academic performance among English students. XLinguae, European Scientific Language Journal, 11(2), 718-727. http://eprints.unm.ac.id/id/eprint/11714 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18355/XL.2018.11.02.56
Wilkinson, T. J., Wells, J. E., & Bushnell, J. A. (2007). Medical student characteristics associated with time in study: Is spending more time always a good thing? Medical Teacher, 29(2-3), 106-110. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590601175317 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590601175317
Wood, R. E., & Locke, E. A. (ND). The relation of self-efficacy and grade goals to academic performance. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 47(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164487474017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164487474017
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Maria Crisella A. Dela Cruz, Angelina Lumanlan, Helen Grace Felix, Isabel Dizon, Arnello Valerio, Evelyn Dayrit, Sherry Jean Sison, Rommel Gaña, Elaine Joy Gatchalian
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.