Efficiency of pre-emergent herbicides in weed management in soybean crops
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14295/bjs.v2i4.267Keywords:
Glycine max, glyphosate, productivity, Diclosulam, ImazetapirAbstract
The use of pre-emergent herbicides in soybean crops is an important tool for reducing infestation of these plants. The objective of this work was to evaluate the result of pre-emergent herbicides, using the active ingredients: Diclosulam, S-metolachlor, Imazetapyr, all of which are associated with the active ingredient Glyphosate, observing how tank mixtures would provide some kind of synergy and/or antagonism, contributing or not for better control of weeds present in the area. The work was carried out at the Experimental Station of BASF - Rio Verde Unit, located in the rural area of the municipality of Rio Verde, State of Goiás, Brazil. It was conducted in a randomized block design consisting of 8 treatments and 4 replications: Control (Without application), Diclosulam + Glyphosate, S-metolachlor + Glyphosate, Imazethapyr + Glyphosate, Diclosulam + S-metolachlor + Glyfosulam + Glyfosate, Diclosulam + Imazetate; S-metolachlor + Imazethapyr + Glyphosate, Diclosulam + S-metolachlor + Imazethapyr + Glyphosate. Applications of pre-emergent herbicides occurred soon after sowing of soybean cultivar CZ 37B22 IPRO. Weed emergence flow control evaluations were carried out after herbicide application at 7, 14, 21, 28 and 112 days after the application of treatments. The harvest was harvested from the useful area of the plots to quantify the soybean yield. Data were compiled for analysis of variance using the F and significant test, and means were compared using the Tukey test p > 0.05 using the SASM-Agri® software. The active ingredient mixtures with the best performance on the flow of monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous weeds were: Glyphosate 1,200 g.ha-1 + Diclosulam 36.6 g.ha-1 + S-metolachlor 1,152 g.ha-1; Glyphosate 1,200 g.ha-1 + Diclosulam 36.6 g.ha-1 + Imazetapyr 106 g.ha-1, Glyphosate 1,200 g.ha-1 + S-metolachlor 1,152 g.ha-1 + Imazetapyr 106 g.ha-1, analyzing the variable productivity, the treatment with the highest yield was the mixture of Glyphosate 1,200 g.ha-1 + Diclosulam 36.6 g.ha-1.
References
Amim, R. T., Freitas, S. P., Freitas, I. L J., & Scarso, M. F. (2016). Banco de sementes do solo após a aplicação de herbicidas pré-emergentes durante quatro safras de cana-de-açúcar. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 51(10), 1710-1719. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2016001000002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-204x2016001000002
Andrade, G. C. G., Filho, R. C., & Cunha, M. G. (2018). Resistance of soybean genotypes to white mold in distinct agroecosystems. Revista de Agricultura Neotropical, 5(1), 7-16. https://doi.org/10.32404/rean.v5i1.1759 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32404/rean.v5i1.1759
Azevedo, L. A. S. (2015). Mistura em Tanque de Produtos Fitossanitários: Teoria e Prática. 1ª Ed., Rio de Janeiro: IMOS Gráfica e Editora, 230 p.
Canteri, M. G., Althaus, R. A., Virgens Filho, J. S., Giglioti, E. A., & Godoy, C. V. (2001). SASM - Agri: Sistema para análise e separação de médias em experimentos agrícolas pelos métodos Scoft - Knott, Tukey e Duncan. Revista Brasileira de Agrocomputação, 1(2), 18-24. https://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/bitstream/doc/512901/1/SASMAGRI.pdf
Conab. (2021). Acompanhamento da safra brasileira de grãos: décimo primeiro levantamento, agosto 2020, safra 2019/2020. Brasília, DF, 2020. Disponível em https://www.conab.gov.br/info-agro/safras/grãos. Acesso em 07 jun. 2021.
Cruz, A. b. s., Rocha, P. R. R., Albuquerque, J. A. A., Alves, J. M. A., Cruz, D. L. S., Finoto, E. L., & Santos, G. X. L. (2018). Seletividade de herbicidas aplicados em pré e pós-emergência na cultura do feijão-caupi na savana amazônica. Nativa, 6(6), 625-630. https://doi.org/10.31413/nativa.v6i6.5732 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31413/nativa.v6i6.5732
Ferreira, E. A., Paiva, M. C. G., Pereira, G. A. M., Oliveira, M. C., & Silva, E. B. (2019). Fitossociologia de plantas dainhas na cultura do milho submetida à aplicação de doses de nitrigênio. Revista de Agricultura Neotropical, 6(2), 109-116. https://doi.org/10.32404/rean.v6i2.2710 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32404/rean.v6i2.2710
Freitas, M. C. M. (2011). A cultura da soja no Brasil: o crescimento da produção brasileira e o surgimento de uma nova fronteira agrícola. Enciclopédia Biosfera, 7(12), 1-12. https://www.conhecer.org.br/enciclop/2011a/agrarias/a%20cultura%20da%20soja.pdf
Furquim, L. T., Monquero, P. A., & Silva, R. P. (2019). Efeito de herbicidas no crescimento inicial do sorgo sacarino. Nativa, 7(1), 37-42. https://doi.org/10.31413/nativa.v7i1.6441 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31413/nativa.v7i1.6441
Júnior, D. L. T., Alves, J. M. A., Albuquerque, J. A. A., Rocha, P. R. R., Castro, T. S., & Barreto, G. F. (2020). Ocorrência de plantas daninhas na cultura do feijão-caupi sob quatro manejos na Amazônia Ocidental. Nativa, 8(3), 427-435. https://doi.org/10.31413/nativa.v8i3.8949 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31413/nativa.v8i3.8949
Lacerda, M. L., Silva, D. L. S., Aspiazú, I., Carvalho, A. J., Oliveira, S. M., & Silva, R. F. (2021). Fitossociologia de plantas daninhas em cultivo de feijão-caupi no semiárido mineiro. Nativa, 9(5), 528-535. https://doi.org/10.31413/nativa.v9i5.11210 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31413/nativa.v9i5.11210
Lamego, F. P., Reinehr, M., Cutti, L., Aguiar, A. C. M., Rigon, C. A. G., & Pagliarini, I. B. (2015). Alterações morfológicas de plântulas de trigo, azevém e nabo quando em competição nos estádios iniciais de crescimento. Planta Daninha, 33(1), 13-22. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582015000100002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582015000100002
Mancuso, M. A. C. (2011). Efeito residual de herbicidas no solo (“Carryover”). Revista Brasileira de Herbicidas, 10(2), 151-164. https://doi.org/10.7824/rbh.v10i2.106 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7824/rbh.v10i2.106
Melo, C. A. D., Medeiros, W. N., Tuffi Santos, L. D., Ferreira, F. A., Ferreira, G. L., & Paes, F. A. S. (2010). Efeito residual de sulfentrazone, isoxaflutole e oxyfluorfen em três solos. Planta Daninha, 28(4), 835-842. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582010000400017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582010000400017
Merotto Júnior, A., Vidal, R. A., Fleck, N. G., & Almeida, M. L. (2002). Interferência das plantas daninhas sobre o desenvolvimento inicial de plantas de soja e arroz através da qualidade da luz. Planta Daninha, 20(1), 9-16. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582002000100002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582002000100002
Monquero, P. A., Binha, D. P., Silva, P. V., & Amaral, L. R. (2008). Eficiência de herbicidas pré-emergentes após períodos de seca. Planta Daninha, 26(1). https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582008000100019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582008000100019
Mueller, C. T., Boswell, B. W., Mueller, S. S., Steckel, L. E. (2014). Dissipation of Fomesafen, Saflufenacil, Sulfentrazone, and Flumioxazin from a Tennessee Soil under Field Conditions. Weed Science, 62(4), 664-671. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1614/WS-D-13-00183.1
Neto, M. E. F., Pitelli, R. A., Basile, E. A. G., & Timossi, P. C. (2009). Selectivity of post-emergence herbicides applied on genetically modified soybeans. Planta Daninha, 27(2), 345-352. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582009000200018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582009000200018
Pereira, G. R., Costa, N. V., Moratelli, G., & Rodrigues-Costa, A. C. P. (2017). Growth and development of Digitaria insularis biotypes susceptible and resistant to glyphosate. Planta Daninha, 35(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582017350100025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-83582017350100025
Pinto, R. S., Botelho, F. M., Botelho, S. C. C., Angeli, A. M. (2017). Qualidade de grãos de soja em diferentes épocas de colheita. Nativa, 5, 463-479. http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/2318-7670.v05nespa01 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5935/2318-7670.v05nespa01
Santos, H. G. (2018). Sistema Brasileiro de Classificação de Solos. 5ª Ed., rev. e ampl. − Brasília, DF: Embrapa, 356 p.
Santos, G., Francischini, A. C., Constantin, J., & Oliveira Jr., R. S. (2012). Carry-over Effect of S-Metolachlor and Trifluralin on Bean, Corn and Soybean Crops. Planta Daninha, 30(4), 827-834. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582012000400017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582012000400017
Silva, A. F., Ferreira, E. A., Concenço, G., Ferreira, F. A., Aspiazu, I., Galon, L., Sediyama, T., & Silva, A. A. (2008). Densidades de plantas daninhas e épocas de controle sobre os componentes de produção da soja. Planta daninha, 26(1), 65-71. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582008000100007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582008000100007
Sousa, D.M.G., & Lobato, E. (2004). Cerrado: correção do solo e adubação. 2ª Ed., Brasília, DF. Embrapa Informação Tecnológica, 416 p.
Walsh, K. D., Soltani, N., Hoocker, D. C., Nurse, R. E., & Sikkema, P. H. (2014). Biologically effective rate of sulfentrazone applied pre-emergence in soybean. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 95(2), 339-344. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjps-2014-264 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4141/cjps-2014-264
Weed Science Society of America. (2021). Official WSSA definitions. Disponível em https://wssa.net/wssa/wssa-glossary/. Acesso em 24 jun. 2021.
Yamashita, O. M., Silva, G. B., Neto, R. M. R., Campos, O. R., & Peres, W. M. (2017). Interferência de subdoses de glyphosate no desenvolvimento de plantas jovens de nim. Nativa, 5(3), 163-268. https://doi.org/10.31413/nativa.v5i3.4193 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5935/2318-7670.v05n03a02
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Paulo Henrique Oliveira Silva, Fernando Rezende Côrrea, Nelmício Furtado da Silva, Wendson Soares da Silva Cavalcante, Daniele Ferreira Ribeiro, Estevão Rodrigues
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.