Interaction of tank mix between diquat and glyphosate herbicides in desiccation of fallow land

Authors

  • Ueliton Venancio de Sousa University Center of Southwest Goiano, UniBRAS, Rio Verde, Goias, Brazil
  • Fernando Rezende Côrrea DeLollo Research Station, Rio Verde, Goias, Brazil https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7110-3611
  • Nelmício Furtado da Silva University of Rio Verde, UniRV, Rio Verde, Goias, Brazil
  • Wendson Soares da Silva Cavalcante University of Rio Verde, UniRV, Rio Verde, Goias, Brazil https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5224-5486
  • Daniele Ferreira Ribeiro GPAC – Cerrado Agriculture Research Group, Rio Verde, Goiás, Brazil https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4098-8725
  • Estevão Rodrigues MRE Agropesquisa, Rio Verde, Goias, Brazil

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14295/bjs.v2i2.264

Keywords:

weeds, control, compatibility, Cerrado

Abstract

The combination of herbicides in a tank mix is a frequent and operationally convenient practice. The possibility or not of the occurrence of antagonism between associated herbicides depends on the characteristics of the herbicide, the composition of the application mixture and the target. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the interaction of the tank mixture between the herbicides diquat and glyphosate in the desiccation of fallow areas. The experiment was carried out at UniBRAS' Teaching, Research and Extension Farm - Faculdade Rio Verde, in the municipality of Rio Verde - GO. The experimental design used was randomized blocks with four replications. Treatments consisted of: T1) Diquat; T2) Diquat + Mineral Oil; T3) Diquat + Glyphosate + Mineral Oil; T4) Glyphosate + Mineral Oil; and T5) Control. Evaluations of crop phytotoxicity and weed control were carried out at 7, 14 and 21 days after application. The data were submitted to analysis of variance by the F test (p < 0.05) and the cases of significance were submitted to the Tukey mean test (p < 0.05). The isolated use of glyphosate with mineral oil showed the greatest weed control at 7, 14 and 21 days after application. Diquat alone and mixed with oil did not promote satisfactory control of the weed community, possibly this can be attributed to the higher concentration of grasses present in the area. The association of diquat with glyphosate possibly caused antagonism between the molecules.

References

Adapar (2021). Agência de Defesa Agropecuária do Paraná. Bula Tocha®. Disponível em: <http://www.adapar.pr.gov.br/arquivos/File/defis/DFI/Bulas/Herbicidas/tocha.pdf>. Acesso em 05 abril de 2021.

Alvares, C. A., Stape, J. L., Sentelhas, P. C., Gonçalves, J. L. M., Sparovek, G. (2013). Köppen’s climate classification map

for Brazil. Meteorologische Zeitschrift, 22(6), 711–728. http://dx.doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2013/0507 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2013/0507

Azevedi, L. A. S. (2015). Mistura em Tanque de Produtos Fitossanitários: Teoria e Prática. 1. Ed. – Rio de Janeiro: IMOS Gráfica e Editora.

Barbosa, A. S., Nascimento, I. R., Fidelis, R. R., Sousa, S. M., & Pelúzio, J. M. (2019). Nativa, 7(1), 13-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.31413/nativa.v7i1.6613 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31413/nativa.v7i1.6613

Barnes, J. W., & Oliver, L. R. (2004). Cloransulam antagonizes annual grass control with aryloxyphenoxypropionate graminicides but not cyclohexanediones. Weed Technology, 18(3), 763-772. s://doi.org/10.1614/WT-03-181R DOI: https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-03-181R

Barros, D. M., Silva, P. V., Meurer, H. L., Meurer, L. S., Domingos, E. R., Dias, R. C., Inácio, E. M., & Monquero, P. A. (2021). Regime de irrigação e palha influenciam na eficácia de herbicidas pré-emergentes no controle de capim-amargoso? Nativa, 9(2), 194-201. https://doi.org/10.31413/nativa.v9i2.11844 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31413/nativa.v9i2.11844

Bethke, R. K., Molin, W. T., Sprague, C., & Penner, D. (2013). Evaluation of the interaction between glyphosate and glufosinate. Weed Science, 61(1), 41-47. https://doi.org/10.1614/WS-D-12-00031.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1614/WS-D-12-00031.1

Blanco, F. M. G. (2004). Controle Químico das plantas Daninhas na Cultura do Café. In: X Reunião Itinerante de Fitossanidade do Instituto Biológico Café.

Bondarenko, A., & Tyutyuma, N. (2022). Biological effectiveness of onion plant protection scheme. Revista de Agricultura Neotropical, 9(3), e6930. https://doi.org/10.32404/rean.v9i3.6930 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32404/rean.v9i3.6930

Camargo, R., Antoniolli, P. R., Vicente, E., & Tfouni, S. A. V. (2011). Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in Brazilian soybean oils and dietary exposure. Food Additives and Contaminants, 4(2), 152-159. https://doi.org/10.1080/19393210.2011.585244 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19393210.2011.585244

Camargo, M. C. R., Antoniolli, P. R., & Vicente, E. (2012). Evaluation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons content in different stages of soybean oils processing. Food Chemistry, 135(3), 937-942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.06.031 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.06.031

Canteri, M. G., Althaus, R. A., das Virgens Filho, J. S., Giglioti, E. A., & Godoy, C. V. (2001). SASM-AGRI-Sistema para análise e separação de médias em experimentos agrícolas pelos métodos Scott-Knott, Tukey e Duncan. Revista Brasileira de Agrocomputação, 1(2), 18-24.

Carvalho, F. T., Alvarenga, S. L. A., Peruchi, M., & Palazzo, R. R. B. (2002). Eficácia do carfentrazone-ethyl aplicado no manejo das plantas daninhas para o plantio direto do algodão. Revista Brasileira de Herbicidas, 3(2-3), 104-108. https://doi.org/10.7824/rbh.v3i2-3.379 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7824/rbh.v3i2-3.379

Colby, S. R. (1967). Calculating synergistic and antagonistic responses of herbicide combinations. Weeds, 15(1), 20-22. https://doi.org/10.2307/4041058 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/4041058

Corrêa, G. C., Pinto, C. A., Freitas, E. M., Júnior, L. C. C., & Morgado, C. M. A. (2019). Management of Urochloa ruziziensis with glyphosate in integrated system with glyphosate-resistant corn. Revista de Agricultura Neotropical, 6(4), 63-68. https://doi.org/10.32404/rean.v6i4.3377 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32404/rean.v6i4.3377

Costa, L. L., Almeida, D. P., Timossi, P. C., de Melo Santos, T. C., de Oliveira Bonifácio, F., & de Oliveira Borges, B. (2019). Interação entre herbicidas no controle de soja RR voluntária na cultura do milho. Revista Brasileira de

Herbicidas, 18(2), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.7824/rbh.v18i2.655 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7824/rbh.v18i2.655

Cruz, A. B. S., Rocha, P. R. R., Albuquerque, J. A. A., Alves, J. M. A., Cruz, D. L. S., Finoto, E. L., Santos, G. X. L. (2018). Seletividade de herbicidas aplicados em pré e pós-emergência na cultura do feijão-caupi na Savana Amazônica. Nativa, 6(6), 625-630. http://dx.doi.org/10.31413/nativa.v6i6.5732 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31413/nativa.v6i6.5732

Dalazen, G., Kruse, N. D., & Machado, S. L. D. O. (2015). Herbicidas de uso potencial no controle de buva e sua seletividade sobre aveia e azevém. Revista Ciência Agronômica, 46(4), 792-799. https://doi.org/10.5935/1806-6690.20150067 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5935/1806-6690.20150067

De Vargas Pereira, L., de Carvalho, L. B., & Dal Magro, T. (2016). Controle químico de buva resistente a glyphosate é mais eficaz no pré-florescimento ou no rebrote?. Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias, 15(3), 277-280. https://doi.org/10.5965/223811711532016277 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5965/223811711532016277

Ferreira, D. F. (2011). Sisvar: a computer statistical analysis system. Ciência e agrotecnologia, 35(6), 1039-1042. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-70542011000600001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-70542011000600001

Furquim, L. T., Monquero, P. A., & Silva, R. P. (2019). Efeito de herbicidas no crescimento inicial do sorgo sacarino. Nativa, 7(1), 37-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.31413/nativa.v7i1.6441 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31413/nativa.v7i1.6441

Gazziero, D. L. P. (2010). Interferência da buva em áreas cultivadas com soja. In: XXVII Congresso brasileiro da ciência das plantas daninhas. Ribeirão Preto, SP. Anais. 1555-1558.

Gazziero, D. L. P. (2015). Misturas de agrotóxicos em tanque nas propriedades agrícolas do Brasil. Planta Daninha, 33(1), 83-92. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582015000100010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582015000100010

Heap, I. (2020). The international survey of herbicide resistant weeds. WeedScience. org. Accessed: August, 25, 2020.

Jones, G. M., & Vale, A. (2000). Mechanisms of toxicity, clinical features, and management of diquat poisoning: A review. Journal of Toxicology: Clinical Toxicology, 38(2), 123-128. https://doi.org/10.1081/CLT-100100926 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1081/CLT-100100926

Köppen, W., Geiger, R. (1928). Klimate der Erde. Gotha: Verlag Justus Perthes. Wall-map 150cmx200cm. <http://geography.about.com/library/weekly/aa011700b.htm.

Marchi, G., Marchi, E. C. S., Guimarães, T. G. (2008). Herbicidas: mecanismos de ação e uso. Brasilia: Embrapa Cerrados - Documentos (INFOTECA-E).

Matzenbacher, F. D. O., Kalsing, A., Dalazen, G., Markus, C., & Merotto Jr, A. (2015). Antagonism is the predominant effect of herbicide mixtures used for imidazolinone-resistant barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) control. Planta Daninha, 33, 587-597. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582015000300021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582015000300021

Mechi, I. A., Santos, A. L. F., Ribeiro, L. M., & Ceccon, G. (2018). Infestação de plantas daninhas de difícil controle em função de anos de consórcio milho-braquiária. Revista de Agricultura Neotropical, 5(3), 49-54. https://doi.org/10.32404/rean.v5i3.1642 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32404/rean.v5i3.1642

Melo, T. S., & Ceccon, G. (2022). Weed composition in autumn-winter crops and soybean in succession. Revista de Agricutura Neotropical, 9(2), e6502. https://doi.org/10.32404/rean.v9i2.6502 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32404/rean.v9i2.6502

Mueller, T. C., Barrett, M., & Witt, W. W. (1990). A basis for the antagonistic effect of 2, 4-D on haloxyfop-methyl toxicity to johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense). Weed Science, 38(2), 103-107. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043174500056216 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043174500056216

Osório, C. R. W. S., Bardiviesso, D. M., Souza, E. I. S., Leite, R. C., Leal, A. J. F., & Souza, H. M. (2015). Milho RR submetido a diferentes manejos de herbicidas e adubação foliar. Nativa, 03(02), 78-82. https://doi.org/10.31413/nativa.v3i2.1911 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14583/2318-7670.v03n02a01

Salvalaggio, A. C., Costa, N. B., Cazzo, V. N., Júnior, E. C., & Eckert, A. F. (2018). Espalhamento e tensão superficial de gotas de soluções com herbicidas e adjuvantes em folhas de Digitaria insularis. Revista de Agricultura Neotropical, 5(30), 60-64. https://doi.org/10.32404/rean.v5i3.1721 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32404/rean.v5i3.1721

Santos, F. L. S., Silva, W. T., Calil, F, N., Cunha, P. P., Costa, R. B., & Ximenes, P. A. (2022). Desiccation of forage plants from Urochloa genus using glyphosate herbicide. Revista de Agricultura Neotropical, 9(1), e6772. https://doi.org/10.32404/rean.v9i1.6772 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32404/rean.v9i1.6772

Santos, V. S., Jakelaitis, A., Pereira, L. S., Sousa, G. D., Oliveira, G. S., Silva, J. N., Vasconselos, S. M. A., & Martins, P. F. (2019). Seleção de espécies vegetais tolerantes ao herbicida hexazine. Nativa, 7(4), 389-395. http://dx.doi.org/10.31413/nativa.v7i4.7266 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31413/nativa.v7i4.7266

Santos, H. G., Jacomine, P. K. T., Anjos, L. H. C., Oliveira, V. A., Lumbreras, J. F., Coelho, M. R., Cunha, T. J. F. (2018). Sistema brasileiro de classificação de solos. 5.ed. Brasília: Embrapa.

Shneider, P. R., Oliveira, L. C. A., Yamashita, O. M., Maia, R. V., Oliveira, J. C., Carvalho, M. A. C. (2020). Nativa, 8(1), 37-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.31413/nativa.v8i1.7997 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31413/nativa.v8i1.7997

Silva, N. F., Cunha, F. N., Teixeira, M. B., Soares, F. A. L., Vidal, V. M., & Morais, W. A. (2017). Reposição hídrica e adubação nitrogenada na cana-de-açúcar via gotejamento subsuperficial: cana-planta e cana-soca. Revista Brasileira de Agricultura Irrigada, 11(6), 1862. http://dx.doi.org/107127/rbaiv11n600642 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7127/rbai.v11n600642

Skora Neto, F. (1998). Manejo de plantas daninhas. In: Plantio direto, pequena propriedade sustentável. Londrina, PR: IAPAR, 128-158 (IA PAR. Circular, 101).

Suntres, Z. E. (2002). Role of antioxidants in Paraquat toxicity. Toxicology, 180(1), 65-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-483X(02)00382-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-483X(02)00382-7

Teixeira, P. C., Donagemma, G. K., Fontana, A., Teixeira, W. G. (2017). Manual de Métodos de Análise de Solo. 3ª edição revista e ampliada. Embrapa, Brasília, DF, 574 p.

Yamashita, O. M., Silva, G. B., Rondon Neto, R. M., Campos, O. R., & Peres, W. M. (2017). Interferência de subdoses de glyphosate no desenvolvimento de plantas jovens de nim. Nativa, 5(3), 163-168. https://doi.org/10.31413/nativa.v5i3.4193 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5935/2318-7670.v05n03a02

Zhang, J., Hamill, A. S., & Weaver, S. E. (1995). Antagonism and synergism between herbicides: trends from previous studies. Weed technology, 9(1), 86-90. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0890037X00023009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0890037X00023009

Downloads

Published

2023-02-01

How to Cite

Sousa, U. V. de, Côrrea, F. R., Silva, N. F. da, Cavalcante, W. S. da S., Ribeiro, D. F., & Rodrigues, E. (2023). Interaction of tank mix between diquat and glyphosate herbicides in desiccation of fallow land. Brazilian Journal of Science, 2(2), 61–70. https://doi.org/10.14295/bjs.v2i2.264

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 2 (2023): Brazilian Journal of Science

Section

Agrarian and Biological Sciences

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Ueliton Venancio de Sousa, Fernando Rezende Côrrea, Nelmício Furtado da Silva, Wendson Soares da Silva Cavalcante, Daniele Ferreira Ribeiro, Estevão Rodrigues

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

 

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.